Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Medical Lawand Ethics Essays

Clinical Lawand Ethics Essays Clinical Lawand Ethics Paper Clinical Lawand Ethics Paper In this clinical case, it is depicted how Johnny, a 2-year old kid, has been determined to have Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and necessities blood transfusion promptly since his hemoglobin tally has dropped to definitely hazardous levels. As indicated by the clinical report introduced for the situation, Johnny could kick the bucket should his hemoglobin keep on diminishing on the grounds that it is basic in conveying oxygenated blood. The issue and moral problem for the situation, in any case, is that the boy’s guardians, Sarah and Tom, are rehearsing Jehovah’s Witnesses, which is a religion that restricts any type of blood transfusion among its individuals. Actually, I accept that having an expert code of morals assumed a crucial job in activities of the human services group in tending to Johnny’s sickness. As expressed for the situation, there are different choices to treat Johnny’s condition. The choices that the group utilized are oral/intravenous/intramuscular arrangements of iron and Epogen, a province animating element that can be utilized to trigger the patient’s bone marrow to deliver fresh blood cells. Be that as it may, Johnny’s wellbeing kept on decaying and he required prompt platelet transfusion, which is against the religion of his folks. Yet, a court request decided that if there should arise an occurrence of a perilous condition, the kid must get transfusion thus the guardians had no real option except to permit it. After examining this case utilizing the Three-Step Ethics model, three inquiries must be posed: Is it lawful? Is it adjusted? Furthermore, how can it cause one to feel? Obviously, the responses to every one of those inquiries are yes in light of the fact that the social insurance group could’ve disregarded the patient’s religion and continued quickly with a transfusion. In any case, the group decided to forego the system until it is promptly required, which demonstrated that they acted as per their expert code of morals and the laws of the patient’s religion. In addition, in spite of the fact that Sue, the attendant who controlled the transfusion, felt regretful with her activities, at long last, the outcomes demonstrated advantageous to all gatherings. Johnny had the option to recoup from his disease and has been empowered to carry on with a solid life once more. To put it plainly, the activities of the social insurance group was commonly moral since they practiced judgment dependent on their expert code of morals,, acted by the laws of both the state and the patient’s religion, and the greater part of all, spared the evil boy’s life. References McNeil, S. (1997). Johnny’s story: transfusing a Jehovah’s Witness. B. net. Pediatric Nursing. Recovered July 12, 2009 from http://findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m0FSZ/is_n3_v23/ai_n18607405/? tag=content;col1.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.